Equanimity: The Calm That Survives Bad News
I sat in a ten-day silent retreat in 2019. By day six, a woman two rows ahead of me started sobbing during morning sit. Not quiet tears. Full-body, shaking sobs that the instructors handled by⊠doing nothing. âReturn to the breath,â the teacher said over the PA system. She left the retreat that afternoon.
I didnât think much of it at the time. People have breakthroughs, right? Emotional release is part of the process. Thatâs what I told myself.
But Iâve been reading the clinical literature thatâs come out over the past two years, and Iâm starting to think the mindfulness community has a blind spot the size of a meditation hall. Not about whether meditation works (it clearly does for many people). About what happens when it doesnât. And about the roughly one in ten practitioners who walk away worse than they started.
A 2024 meta-analysis published in Clinical Psychology Review pulled together data from 8,000+ meditation practitioners and found that about 10% experienced clinically significant adverse effects. Not âI felt a little uncomfortable.â Lasting problems: depersonalization, panic attacks, re-traumatization, psychotic episodes. The study, led by researchers including Willoughby Brittonâs team at Brown University, controlled for pre-existing conditions. These werenât just vulnerable people having predictable reactions. Some were experienced meditators with no psychiatric history.
A separate study in Psychological Science found that meditation can increase risk-taking behavior and reduce the kind of healthy caution that keeps us functional. Thatâs a subtler effect, but it lines up with what contemplative traditions have warned about for centuries: certain states of detachment, taken too far, arenât liberation. Theyâre dissociation wearing a spiritual costume.
The numbers vary across studies (some report 8%, others as high as 14%) but the pattern is consistent. A meaningful minority of people who meditate regularly experience negative effects that persist beyond the cushion. And the deeper the practice, the higher the risk.
The adverse effects arenât random. They cluster into recognizable patterns:
Dissociation and depersonalization. Feeling disconnected from your body, like youâre watching yourself from outside. The world takes on an unreal quality. For people practicing ânotingâ or âobservingâ techniques heavily, this makes a kind of terrible sense. Youâre training yourself to step back from experience, and sometimes you step back too far.
Anxiety and panic. Sitting with your thoughts sounds peaceful until the thoughts include unprocessed trauma. Without proper support, meditation can strip away the psychological defenses people have built. Defenses that, whatever their costs, were keeping them functional. One Brown University study participant described it as âremoving the walls of a house and being surprised the roof collapsed.â
Emotional blunting. The flip side of equanimity. Some practitioners report losing access to positive emotions along with negative ones. They can observe anger without reacting, sure. But they also canât feel joy, connection, or love the way they used to. Theyâve meditated themselves into a kind of emotional flatline.
Re-traumatization. For people with trauma histories, body-focused meditation can bring up somatic memories without the therapeutic framework to process them. This is the one that concerns therapists most. A trauma survivor doing a body scan isnât just feeling their left knee. They might be surfacing stored physical responses to events theyâve spent years learning to manage.
Thereâs a financial reason and a philosophical one.
The financial reason is obvious. Mindfulness is a multi-billion-dollar industry. Apps, retreats, corporate wellness programs, teacher trainings. The pitch is simple: meditation reduces stress, improves focus, makes you happier. Adding an asterisk (unless youâre one of the 10% for whom it might cause lasting psychological harm) complicates the marketing.
The philosophical reason is more interesting. Within Buddhist contemplative traditions, difficult experiences during meditation are well-documented. The Theravada maps of insight describe stages like dukkha ñanas (âknowledges of sufferingâ) where practitioners pass through terror, misery, and disgust as part of the path. The Dark Night of the Soul isnât a bug; itâs a feature. But hereâs the thing: those traditions also came with extensive teacher support, community context, and a framework for understanding what was happening. The instructions werenât âdownload this app and sit for ten minutes.â They were years of apprenticeship with someone whoâd been through it.
We stripped meditation of its safety infrastructure and repackaged it as a wellness product. Then we acted surprised when people got hurt.
If youâve been exploring meditation apps for mindful practice, this context matters. The apps arenât the problem, but theyâre rarely designed to flag when someone should stop.
The Stoics were practicing structured self-examination two thousand years ago, and they had a remarkably clear-eyed view of its risks.
Seneca warned that too much introspection without direction becomes ruminatio, turning thoughts over and over without resolution. He didnât just recommend self-reflection; he recommended guided self-reflection with specific questions and stopping points. His evening review practice asked âWhat bad habit did I correct today? What vice did I resist? In what way am I better?â Not âSit with whatever arises.â
The Stoic practice of prosoche (attention) is instructive here. Itâs mindfulness, but directed. Youâre not observing thoughts neutrally. Youâre watching for specific things: impressions that trigger unhelpful judgments, moments where you confuse what you can control with what you canât. Thereâs a purpose to the attention. That purposefulness acts as a kind of guardrail.
This connects to what research now shows about Stoic emotional regulation. The practices work partly because theyâre structured. Cognitive distancing is different from dissociation precisely because you maintain engagement with the world while examining your reactions to it.
Marcus Aurelius didnât meditate to empty his mind. He meditated to fill it with better questions.
Based on the current research, certain factors increase the likelihood of adverse effects:
Intensive practice. Retreats and extended sessions carry more risk than brief daily sits. The Brown study found that most serious adverse events happened during retreats or periods of practice exceeding 45 minutes daily.
Trauma history. Especially unprocessed trauma. If you havenât done therapeutic work around significant traumatic experiences, meditation can open doors youâre not ready to walk through.
Certain techniques. Open monitoring and body scan practices show higher adverse event rates than focused attention practices. Concentration on a single object (like the breath) appears safer than techniques that ask you to observe whatever arises.
Lack of teacher support. Solo practitioners and app users report adverse effects more often than those working with qualified teachers. The teacher doesnât prevent difficult experiences. They help you navigate them.
Pre-existing dissociative tendencies. If you already experience depersonalization or derealization, practices that emphasize detachment from experience can amplify those tendencies.
If youâre someone who found that mindfulness helped with depression tied to childhood adversity, thatâs real and valid. But itâs also true that the same practice that helps one person with trauma history can destabilize another. Context matters enormously.
The research points toward several practical shifts the mindfulness community needs to make.
Screening before intensive practice. Retreats should ask about psychiatric history, trauma, and current mental health treatment. Some already do. Many donât. This should be standard, not optional.
Informed consent. Every meditation program (apps included) should tell practitioners that adverse effects are possible and provide guidance on what to do if they occur. We do this for physical exercise. We should do it for mental exercise.
Graduated practice. Starting with shorter, more structured practices (like Stoic prosoche or focused breathing) before moving to open monitoring or extended sessions. The research on meditation and neuroplasticity confirms that these practices produce real brain changes. And real brain changes arenât always comfortable.
Better teacher training. Meditation teachers need education in recognizing adverse effects and knowing when to refer someone to a mental health professional. âJust keep sittingâ isnât acceptable guidance for someone experiencing dissociation or panic.
Integration with therapy. For people with trauma histories, meditation works best as a complement to therapeutic work, not a replacement for it. The two practices can support each other powerfully. But meditation alone, without processing support, can break things open that need professional help to close.
None of this means you should stop meditating. For most people, meditation is genuinely beneficial. The evidence for that is strong. But practicing with awareness of the risks makes you a more informed practitioner.
Start small and structured. Five to fifteen minutes of focused breathing. Not âobserve whatever arises.â Pick an anchor (breath, a phrase, a specific question) and stay with it.
Notice the exits. If you feel yourself floating above your body, losing track of where you are, or experiencing sudden terror, stop. Open your eyes. Feel the chair. Name five things you can see. You can try again tomorrow.
Keep a practice journal. Track not just what you did, but how you felt during and after. Look for patterns. If certain practices consistently leave you feeling worse, thatâs information, not failure.
Work with a teacher. Especially if youâre moving into longer sits or retreat practice. A good teacher has seen what youâre going through and can help you distinguish growth from harm.
Donât push through pain. The âno pain, no gainâ mentality has no place here. Discomfort is normal. Sustained psychological distress is not. If meditation is consistently making your life worse, stopping is the wise choice.
Consider the Stoic alternative. If open-ended meditation feels destabilizing, try structured philosophical practices instead. Evening review exercises, journaling with specific prompts, walking reflection with a guiding question. You get many of the same benefits (self-awareness, emotional regulation, perspective) with built-in guardrails.
I still meditate. I find it valuable. But I meditate differently than I did before reading this research. Shorter sessions. More structure. Less âwherever the mind goesâ and more âwhat specific question am I sitting with today?â
The mindfulness communityâs reluctance to discuss adverse effects isnât just an intellectual failing. It causes real harm. When someone experiences dissociation after a meditation retreat and their teacher says âthatâs just ego dissolution, keep going,â that person doesnât get better. They get worse. And they blame themselves for failing at something that was supposed to help.
About 10% is not a small number. If a medication caused lasting negative effects in 10% of users, weâd demand informed consent, monitoring protocols, and clear guidance on when to stop. Weâd call it a side effect, not a spiritual emergency. Weâd put it on the label.
Meditation deserves the same honesty.
The practice is powerful. Powerful things require respect, not just enthusiasm. And respect starts with telling the truth about what can go wrong.
If youâre experiencing distressing psychological symptoms during or after meditation, consider reaching out to a mental health professional. The practice should support your wellbeing, not undermine it. Thereâs no failure in stopping something that isnât working for you.